http://twitter.com/Othar

The ultimate serial drama: Every episode is 140 characters or less. Is anybody else doing this? It seemed like such an obvious idea as soon as I saw it.

Of course, the medium has drawbacks. Twitter drops the occasional old message. And it offers a really lousy interface for going back to the beginning of an account's tweets and reading them in chronological order.

I love the drama, the slapstick, the dramatic slapstick, and the Jagermonsters. I also like that Phil and Kaja Folglio don't take themselves or their work too seriously, except in that it is all extremely well done to the last detail and all thoroughly enjoyable.

And the storylines . . . marvelous!

The first few storylines are silly and great fun. The latest one has turned unexpectedly poignant, touches on main continuity, and is just fascinating...

Please.

For the sake of accuracy, if not science.

It's Othar Tryggvassen, Gentleman Adventurer.

Except that something in my fingers balks when I try to type "Othar Tryggvassen, Gentleman Adventurer's Twitter". That phrase just does not read right. Whatever it describes, it isn't what I'm trying to describe.

"There is no time for love in Science!"

I mean, Pierre Curie says while he is proposing to Marie.

Science!

*hysterical giggles*

She took a rubber duck, and we saw what she did with it.

Some time ago, fidelio reviewed the DVD release of Fritz Lang’s “The Girl in the Moon” and mentionned another line that would fit right in with “Girl Genius”:

"Don't force me to take stronger measures, Mr. Helius. Choose the lesser of two evils--me!"

Gunnerkrigg Court ought to be mandatory reading for any sci-fi/fantasy reader.

Has anyone else noticed a trend towards good stories with strong female characters in popular media these days?

"Girl Genius" -- strong lead
"Bones" -- strong lead
"NCIS" -- strong ensemble members, if not leads
"Stargate SG-1" - strong ensemble member
"Firefly" -- strong ensemble members
"BTVS" -- strong lead AND strong ensemble member

...just to name a few off the top of my head, and gee, did Josh Whedon start this? Strong female characters who are competent, do more than be the victim of the week to be rescued by the guys, still feminine, but have things to talk about besides the guys in their life?

Or possibly my personal preferences send me toward shows like that, but I don't remember so many shows with good, strong female characters back in the 70s and 80s. Regardless, I like this trend.

How about "Othar Tryggvassen, Twittering Adventurer!"?

(And how about that punctuation conundrum?)

Wes Craven was already doing it years before Whedon's first movie. (E.g. Nightmare on Elm Street.)

BWAHAHAHAH!!!

And I also really enjoy Gunnerkrigg Court. I am trying to encourage my daughter to read them both and share with her friends.

Scott

Dresden Codak, at www.dresdencodak.com - first strip is at http://dresdencodak.com/2005/06/08/the-tomorrow-man/ , but it may make more sense to start with the Hob sequence, http://dresdencodak.com/2007/02/08/pom/ .

And 2D Goggles, starring Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace. (They fight crime.)
Start at http://sydneypadua.com/2dgoggles/lovelace-the-origin-2/ .

Both update slowly. (I may actually have found either or both as a sidelight particle here, but if so, they've since scrolled down off the bottom...)

--Dave

I am allowing myself to read four pages of Gunnerkrigg Court a week, so that it takes me longer to hit the head of feed.

"Good heavens, Miss Sakamoto! You're beautiful!"

Currently, our adventures put us on contemporary Earth, so when we need something, we look for it on the web. Even though there isn't a real Bugtussle, Iowa, we know where it should be, where the nearest real town is, and where the other Bugtussles are. We know how much our personal jet, a 1-11 [should have] cost, and we even know its interior layout.

We think it's hysterical.

Guess I should thank you for corrupting mine, too. Except that my mind's pretty old.

My wife likes to point out, however, that although the storylines are fun, the artwork seems a continuation of the grand tradition of over-bosomed, half-naked women that superhero comics perfected decades ago. Even though the characters are strong women, she's turned off by the (in her opinion) oversexualized drawing style--any potental message about female power is mitigated by their portrayal as sex objects.

I still like the stories, but now I wince a little when, for example, Zeetha gets her clothes stripped off and then runs around for months (our time) with only the barest of coverings for her breasts.

Has anyone else had similar reactions?

I took a quick look*, just to make sure I hadn't overlooked any inappropriate anatomy, and I really don't have a problem with the way Agatha or Zeetha are drawn, although I do understand your wife's reaction -- the hypersexual style is one of the main reasons I gave up on Marvel and DC years ago. Girl Genius is definitely in the zaftig heroine category, so each reader would have to decide for herself whether to approve.

*No, really -- I wasn't catching up on today's episode; I was doing research.

Of course. By the way, today's episode shows the nefarious uses to which health insurance can be put.

I was going to say something about "Agatha doesn't get all that undressed", but it turns out that I just get distracted by all the OTHER cool stuff.

number of cleavage shots in that link: 5.
Number of things in that link I found REALLY FUNNY: 6.

Is it me or do those pajamas ... umm... match the snacks?

I suspect that part of the reason we get less beefcake that the male leads get significantly less screen time than Agatha. Only part, alas; I could use more shots of Gil without his shirt.

Actually, I counted six (6) cleavage shots in that one. I just chalk them up as part of the fashion of the time. There are enough other non-current fashion cues going on to make it all fit in.

Speaking of gratuitous cleavage, does anyone besides me remember "Cowgirls at War" and other comics with super-realistic styles that accompanied R Crumb and others' underground stuff? They used similar styles to the then-current "Terry and the Pirates," etc., with heavy teardrop use a la Brenda Starr and romance comics, but with Lesbian BDSM backgrounds and heavy romance-comic dialog (which is to say almost none).

... but ... she's showing -flesh- and -limbs-!!!! And... she even wears ... [whisper] trousers! [/whisper]