p.s. "view all by" is broken, so I couldn't steal an accented "e" from Mike Ford.

It seemed kinda slim on posts after about 1. CDT. But then I'm kind of fried.

(with apologies) Will he also read Tom Swift and The Boy's Own Paper to the world?

The following makes no sense to me:

"Our readers are the best thing about this weblog. If you’re not reading the comments, you’re missing half the fun."

How can only *half* the fun be the best thing about this weblog?

Why isn't the other half of the fun an equally good thing (in which case the comments are no longer best, merely tied)?

Why aren't there other good things in addition to the fun, in which case the other half of the fun, when added to the other good things, would be the best thing, instead of the comments?

This I could understand:

1 the comments are 3/4 of the fun.
2 There is no good other than the fun.
3 The comments are the best thing.

or

1* the comments are half the fun
2* in addition, they are the exclusive repository of all the other good-making properties in this blog (and there are some)
3* the comments are the best thing.

But as it stands? I just don't get it.

This is also known as "how to win an election with a minority of the votes."

W/r/t your LJ post on the subject of your difficulties with your ISP...

Sorry for the dumb, perhaps nosey question, but other people may be wondering about this too...

Do you do ML the way you do (i.e., run your own blog software on the, um, difficult ISP's machines) because of the volume of traffic? That is, is it economically prohibitive to just do a Typepad-type deal which would give you less control over the look/feel of the blog, but would maybe make your life easier?

Not that Typepad or others like it are even close to perfect, but if the way you are doing it now is wearing you out, maybe shifting to a situation where others are doing more of the work might help?

I don't know much about how you are actually set up now, nor do I grasp the economics of the thing, so I'm perfectly prepared to be told this question is even dumber than it seems to me.

Next: does "best thing" equal "most fun"?

"the fun of the comments, while perhaps no more than half of the overall goodness of the blog, is nevertheless the single largest non-composite good-possessor, and thereby the best *single* thing."

All the other good-making properties, including the other half of the fun, are distributed around into various non-agglomerating constituencies.

Yeah, maybe I'll accept that.

But then I might counter: "sure, by skipping the comments I'm missing the best *single, non-composite thing* in the blog. But I can still gain over half of the good of the blog by:

1) collecting the other half of the fun from the other sources;
and combining that with:
2) the other sources of non-fun good (assuming there are non-fun goods such as information, political enlightenment, moral edification, etc.)

might require more trawling, filtration, and assembly.

But at least I wouldn't have to read the comment-section (ughh!)

By not reading the comments, you'll miss things like the nuclear ice cream and the roasted pygmy mammoth.

Hi, Patrick. I was wondering where everyone else was! (But I got more work done than I otherwise might have, so it was good anyway.)

right. Which for many people would be two good arguments for not reading the comments.

but I assumed that my shudder of disdain at comments threads would be easily seen to be tongue-in-cheek, given that I was writing it *in a comments thread*. Sorry not to have been clearer.

HTML entites are defined by starting with an ampersand and ending with a semicolon, thus, &foo; is theoretically an entity. What you put in the middle is the magic. "¥" gets you ¥. Δ gets you Δ, but δ gets you δ. See the difference? Yes, it works for α through Ω.

Many of them are simple to remember. UK Currency is £ (£). Those of you who have deal with character escape issues are wondering about the ampersand, it's "&", and yes, I typed "ampersand a m p semicolon a m p semicolon", insert the great "and and And and" sentence here. Typophiles will be happy to hear about —

The reason for this whole digression is that HTML capable browsers will work with you to make sure the character shows correctly. You don't have to assume that 0232 is the magic cookie for an acute accent on an it. You'd use either &eacture; or &Eactue; to get é or É and you work all the accents by that pattern -- the accent names are grave, acute, circ(umflex) tilde, and uml(ate).

A full list of the 252 named entites is here, along with their numeric values.

Named entites aren't perfect, but if the browser supports HTML4.0 or XHTML1.0, they will either put up the character you told it to, or put up the "Unknown" character, rather than just grabbing whatever character happens to be in that spot.

You can use numerical entites to access the entire unicode space, but you're much more likely to run into someone who doesn't have a glyph to display. Numeric entites are � for decimal numbers, and &x0000; for hexadecimal numbers (warning, older browsers don't render hex entities. Go figure.) Most modern browsers should see a hebrew letter here: ק and a chinese character here: 葉. If your font set is very good, you'll see a rune here: 𐍆. Most likely, though, you'll see something from your system's Unicode Fallback Font, or some symbol if your system doesn't have a fallback font. In my case, the fallback font the Unicode BMP font, which is ugly, but lets me know what characters the system was trying to render. The prettiest fallback font is, unsurprisingly, Apple's LastResort. Mac users may find something interesting here: 􏿾

Have you looked at James MacDonald's post on how Folksongs Are Your Friends? (Anyone making promises, get their signature in blood on a list of those promises.)

"unless you hate ROFLMAO"

I got lost there on trying to figure out whose A was involved, when you ask me whether I hate ROFLMAO. (I just wasn't sure how *my* ROFL was going to make *your* A fall off--but never mind).

Sure--I'd like to read 'em. Point me to the threads, and I'll be your debtor.

--claire

Mr. Olson, I agree with your view about the "alt" key, but on the other hand, I rarely use more than about four of the special characters, and "alt" has always been successful for me (if by successful one means it shows up correctly on whatever preview screen I happen to be entering data into).

roast pygmy mammoth
D&S: a story from Capclave

Folksongs Are Your Friends

Might I suggest an analogy with the slash and backslash as an apolitical alternative?

An acute accent looks like a tiny slash, a grave like a tiny backslash.

Mind you, you have to be careful about the word slash among some typographers...

(NB: While searching for the above reference, I couldn't make "view all by" work. It hates me, it does.)

Habaneros
D&S
Folksongs

Bad news, web surfer:
Low tide, flat sea, page not found.
Try the search engine?

There are two types of URLs you can use in links: absolute URLs, which include the entire address, and relative URLs, which refer to another page on the same site, and only include the part of the address that is different.

http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006812.html is an absolute URL.
006812.html is a relative URL; the "http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/" bit is added automatically.
Either would have worked.

What I suspect you did was use nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/006812.html - which, since it doesn't begin with "http://", doesn't include the entire address; the server is therefore obliged to assume that it's a relative address and stick "http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/" on the front.