And they are being called traitors today for admitting that things that are happening are in fact happening.

I think that statistic is at least an order of magnitude too low. Perhaps two orders of magnitude.

I only hope that the truth is getting around rural America as the troops come home to tell what is really happening over there. If Bush can't muster poplular support for an invasion of Iran, even the Republicans won't vote for it. Just look at how popular opinion killed the Dubai deal. Republicans in Congress are afraid of catching Bush's bad numbers in an election year. Though, you never know. He might just go in without an act of Congress, but I still like to believe that there are some laws that Bush won't break. (I hope there are.)

If that is indeed his purpose, then yeah, he's wacko. But I am dubious that what we see in all of this is George Bush's objective. Other people (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove) make the real decisions, and they tell Bush stories in language designed to elicit his approval of what they do.

Or maybe not. Maybe it is Bush's design, Bush's choices, Bush's wars.

And, about the Abu Ghraib photos. I honestly don't know how three-quarters of the US population sleeps at night, knowing that they did nothing to stop that. I just don't get it.

'Comparing the total number of bombs and missiles dropped from one year to the next isn't possible because the Central Command releases began late last year to refer to "precision guided bombs" or "precision guided munitions" instead of the actual number and type of bomb used.

'"The change in nomenclature reflects internal angst about whether or not it is appropriate to give the specific types of ordnance dropped,'" said Air Forces spokesman Maj. Robert P. Palmer in an e-mail exchange.'

So, they have nothing to hide?

Farewell to all our country’s fame,
Farewell our ancient glory,
Farewell even to our Army’s good name,
So famed in martial story.
Now blood runs o’er the desert sands,
And cash bleeds like an ocean,
To mark where Cheney’s empire stands.
Such a parcel of rogues rules our nation.

What force or guile could not subdue
Through many greedy ages,
Is bought now by a coward few,
For Halliburton’s wages.
Al-Qaeda’s bombs we could disdain,
Secure in freedom’s station;
But Bush’s fears have been our bane.
Such a parcel of rogues rules our nation.

I would I’d never seen the day
When treason thus could sell us.
But Diebold’s hacks have made it plain,
No matter what they tell us.
With all my power, ‘til my last hour,
I’ll make this declaration:
We’re bought and sold for Saud’s black gold.
Such a parcel of rogues rules our nation.

Do you remember how the 'smart bombs' were going to ensure that no civilians died?

And yes, I'm sure, absolutely sure, that the figures are being fudged and the American people are being lied to.

[From the middle of the song... the whole thing seems too long to post]

Will work for food
Will die for oil
Will kill for power and to us the spoils
The billionaires get to pay less tax
The working poor get to fall through the cracks
Let 'em eat jellybeans let 'em eat cake
Let 'em eat sh$%, whatever it takes
They can join the Air Force, or join the Corps
If they can't make it here anymore

And that's how it is
That's what we got
If the president wants to admit it or not
You can read it in the paper
Read it on the wall
Hear it on the wind
If you're listening at all
Get out of that limo
Look us in the eye
Call us on the cell phone
Tell us all why

US Army plagued by desertion and plunging morale

At least somebody's got an exit strategy....

Osama Jadaan al Dulaimi, a tribal leader in the western town of Karabilah, a town near the Syrian border that was hit with bombs or missiles on at least 17 days between October 2005 and February 2006, said the bombings had created enemies.

"The people of Karabilah hate the foreigners who crossed the border and entered their areas and got into a fight with the Americans," al Dulaimi said. "The residents now also hate the American occupiers who demolished their houses with bombs and killed their families ... and now the people of Karabilah want to join the resistance against the Americans for what they did."

A little American Idol, a little Ambien, a little self-righteous delusionary thinking to damp down any remaining doubts, and hey, no problem!

I poked around more, but the main things I found out are that the numbers are difficult to pin down, and it's hard to know which conflicts to include in the count.

One lesson I know was learned by the defense department, which has an official policy of NOT counting or reporting civilian causalties that they themselves inflicted. Nice quality control going on there if we don't even know when we screw up other than to check the news.

Hearts and minds, yessir Mr President, we'll tell you about all the hearts and minds that we win.

We just won't tell you about all the hearts and minds that we lost by our own incompetence, accidentally attacked and killed because of bad intelligence, laziness, bad training for our men, and abuse.

whoop. whoop. Genius alert. Genius alert. Whoop. Whoop.

From what I read, this is the highest estimate among the many that are out there.

When Abu Graib broke for the first time, I did a little bit of research on Lt. Calley. I feel oddly sorry for the SOB. He was hung out to dry, like the seven low ranked soldiers for Abu Graib. He was guilty. But what we know is that if you put a person in a situation like what Calley was in, or what England was in, they turn into sadists. Perfectly normal, healthy young people become monsters. I believe (Jim, check me on this) that we also know how to stop this: a clean chain of command and officers who do not tolerate sadism.

It's not legal to obey illegal orders, so it can't be legal to give illegal orders, right? Which makes Bush and Rumsfeld and a large number of others in that chain of command guilty as hell.

Seems OK to me. Could you explain again how this resembles My Lai?

Desertion numbers have dropped since 9/11. The Army, Navy and Air Force reported 7,978 desertions in 2001, compared with 3,456 in 2005. The Marine Corps showed 1,603 Marines in desertion status in 2001. That had declined by 148 in 2005.

Don't worry, these aren't needless casualties.

The insurgency in Iraq, like the Vietcong was, is too popular, too intertwined with the population. But if the population is removed, hey presto, no more insurgency.

Therefore terror bombing, therefore the creation of city wide ghettos, therefore death squads.

Terrorise the population, remove the population either by killing them or by locking them up, control their movements and you control the country.

As long as the permanent bases are secure and the oil is under control, it won't matter that the rest of the country is in shambles.

Next stop: Iran.

'In response, the US ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad accused Mr Sadr of hypocrisy in taking ministerial jobs in government. He said: "You cannot be a part of the government while at the same time you issue statements demanding that we leave."'

The original Guardian story is here

Now, maybe I missed a change of plan, but I though that the public aim was that the US would leave as soon as the Iraqi government asked it to do so?

W's facile explanation for 9/11 ignores a history of imperial arrogance by a country which still sees itself as the Great Republic, the light of freedom to the nations. Yet the cause of freedom is not advanced by bombing villages, hospitals, houses; freedom is not won by the deaths of children, the elderly, the frail, and all those who cannot outrun a bomb or a bullet.

Freedom is not won by torture, by holding prisoners without charge, by shooting up wedding parties, or by wearing flight suits and looking martial. Freedom begins with the recognition of what it is not, and of what its absence means. Freedom, ultimately, knows the difference between pride and arrogance.

How would you know? My Lai was reported at the time as a victory: 128 Vietcong killed, only one GI wounded. It took over a year for reports of what really happened to start filtering out.

Compare, if you will, "...officials suspected Quang Ngai Province ... as being a Viet Cong stronghold" with "Salaheddin province ... regarded as a hotbed for insurgents."

The My Lai massacre took place 16MAR68.

In November, 1969, the American public began to learn the details of what happened at My Lai 4. The massacre was the cover story in both Time and Newsweek. CBS ran a Mike Wallace interview with Paul Meadlo. Seymour Hersh published in depth accounts based on his own extensive interviews. Life magazine published Haeberle's graphic photographs.

But that wasn't the point: the point is that escalation is happening, and that by a funny coincidence we're doing this major op on the anniversary of My Lai.

The only real option is, this time around, to fully involve NATO. That's what Bush is desperately trying to do, and that iranian fool is falling for it by giving him perfect excuses. I hope Merkel and deVillepin will be smarter than that.

When the news broke about Abu Ghraib, I noted to a friend of mine that Abu Ghraib seemed, in a specific way, worse. My Lai had the highest levels setting impossible objectives with "I don't care how you do it, just do it," the middle levels going "will nobody rid me of this meddling priest village," and the results... well.

With Abu Ghraib, the methods employed by the torturers seemed to come from QUITE a few layers up the chain of command. Deespite the show trial, once again, focusing on someone as low down the chain as they could find. This time it wasn't even an officer!

I wasn't even born when My Lai happened, and i recognized the similarities.

Couldn't say I was shocked. "Saddened" will have to do.

You can't have a blanket, universal statement like that right next to a side particle about an SAS guy who leaves the British army in disgust and not expect a "Huh?" or two. Not everyone turns into a monster.

The thing is that if you put people into situations like that long enough, they will be reduced to their core personal morals and their core military training. Hopefully, they've been trained to the point where they simply do the right thing. Most military and police fiascos occur because people didn't have the training to deal with a situation. Abu Graib seems to me a classic example of people with practically no training being thrown into a grinder and horrors are the result.

People revert to their training if they have any. They are reduced to their morals if they don't.

The problem with morals is that in situations where war has been your day-to-day experience for months or years, where your day-to-day mode of living is to kill and see your friends be killed, where you are living a daily, constant nightmare, then morals can be pretty hard to find, emotions win out, and then you've got an international incident.

I just read an article saying that fully one-third of all the personell coming back from Iraq, coming out of the US military and back to the states, are getting mental health conseling of one sort or another. Apparently, the pentagon has decided that Post Traumatic Stress Disorder is real and they want to deal with it now, rather than have a massive problem 10 years from now.

Once you've hit that level of stress, you've got little to hold on to but the training that's been drilled into you. And if no one trained you, you're just flapping in the wind.

Proposed project for people who have nothing better to do with their time, all over the country: go to your local library, go back to the first day of the invasion, and start collecting deaths in Iraq or people who were wounded in Iraq. Names, dates, units if given, places if given. Send to places like MoveOn and People for the American Way. Or start a central site: the Iraq Memorial Wall. I think we'd get better numbers that way.

I keep watching this country make the same mistakes. I wonder if the level of outrage is muted because we've seen it before, predicted it long ago, and so when it finally happens it is somewhat anticlimactic.

“Operation Swarmer” is really a media show. It was designed to show off the new Iraqi Army — although there was no enemy for them to fight. Every American official I’ve heard has emphasized the role of the Iraqi forces just days before the third anniversary of the start of the war. That said, one Iraqi role the military will start highlighting in the next few days, I imagine, is that of Iraqi intelligence. It was intel from the Iraqi military intelligence and interior ministry that the U.S. says prompted this Potemkin operation. And it will be the Iraqi intel that provides the cover for American military commanders to throw up their hands and say, “well, we thought bad guys were there.”

-Voltaire, philosopher (1694-1778)

Thank you. I'm going to print that out and stick it on my office door.

Sad, though, isn't it -- my initial reaction to a little bit of brilliance is 'Gee, that would make a great Bumper Sticker'.

It does seem to be an odd mismatch: (1) The biggest air assault since the beginning of the war, and yet (2) they encountered no resistance after 24+ hours (did anyone even shoot back at the americans) and (3) all we have to show for it is 30 people captured.

There's something rotten in my MRE.

Meanwhile, Bomb Iran (.mp3) from the Capitol Steps.

"Don't you know that the smart bombs are
So clever, they only kill bad people?"
— Danny Elfman, War Again

It's probably better conditions than received by those they rendered.

I think this is the sign that the war is lost; the politicos don't want to put enough troops on the ground to win it, never did, so they're bombing instead.

Seems OK to me. Could you explain again how this resembles My Lai?

How would you know? My Lai was reported at the time as a victory: 128 Vietcong killed, only one GI wounded. It took over a year for reports of what really happened to start filtering out.

Today:

U.S. probes more claims of Iraq civilian killings

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- The U.S. military is investigating the deaths of nearly a dozen Iraqi civilians during a U.S. raid near Balad in March.

...

The March 15 incident took place in the Abu Seffa district of Ishaqi, a town 10 miles north of Balad.

Iraqi police said 11 people were killed in a U.S.-led raid against a suspected al Qaeda in Iraq site. The dead included five children -- the youngest 6 months old -- as well as four women and two men, the police said.

The U.S. military reported there had been deaths, including of civilians, but provided a lower casualty count, saying an insurgent, two women and a child were killed.

At the time, U.S. military spokesman Tim Keefe said U.S.-led forces staged the raid and came under fire as they approached a building, and air support fired on the site.

"Coalition forces returned fire, utilizing both air and ground assets," Keefe said, according to The New York Times. The target building was destroyed along with one vehicle.

A Balad police official told CNN at the time that witnesses claimed that U.S. soldiers kept an entire family in a room before spraying them with bullets randomly.

U.S. soldiers destroyed the building and also killed livestock belonging to people in the house, the official said.

Police found bullet casings in the house that would only have been used by U.S. soldiers, the official asserted.

A BBC report on Thursday ran video of the apparent aftermath of the incident, obtained from a Sunni political group. The BBC says the video shows dead bodies with gunshot wounds.

"U.S. soldiers kept an entire family in a room before spraying them with bullets randomly...U.S. soldiers destroyed the building and also killed livestock belonging to people in the house...."

That, my friend, is how it resembles My Lai.